In a recent address to the Economic Club of Canada in Toronto, Carolyn Rogers, the senior deputy governor of the Bank of Canada (BoC), issued a strong warning against the temptation to manipulate mortgage rules as a way to ease the challenges of housing affordability. Rogers’ remarks, delivered on November 6, 2024, highlighted the potential long-term risks of such measures, despite growing concerns over the high cost of homeownership in Canada.
The Risk of “Tinkering” with Mortgage Rules
Carolyn Rogers emphasized that adjusting the rules surrounding mortgages, such as extending amortization periods or reducing mortgage qualification requirements, might provide short-term relief but could have adverse effects on the long-term financial health of households and the broader economy. She cautioned that these adjustments could be a short-sighted solution to a much larger and more complex issue of housing affordability.
“We need to resist the temptation to try to solve the housing affordability challenge by tinkering too much with the mortgage market,” Rogers stated. According to her, the real solution to making housing more affordable lies in addressing the imbalance between housing supply and demand, a process that will inevitably take time and effort.
While Rogers acknowledged the current housing affordability crisis—amplified by high inflation, soaring home prices, and elevated interest rates—she urged a cautious approach when it comes to policy decisions that alter the mortgage landscape.
The Federal Government’s Response: Increased Amortization Period
In response to mounting concerns about the difficulty young Canadians face in entering the housing market, the federal government recently announced a decision to increase the maximum amortization period for first-time homebuyers and buyers of new homes from 25 years to 30 years. This measure was designed to reduce monthly mortgage payments, making homeownership more attainable for some.
The 30-year mortgage plan aims to lower the short-term financial burden on homebuyers by reducing monthly payments, which would help them manage their finances in the face of high home prices and rising borrowing costs. According to Rogers, this policy change may reduce the average mortgage payment by roughly $200 each month, providing immediate relief for buyers who are struggling to afford their homes.
However, Rogers also pointed out a significant downside to this move. While extending the amortization period offers lower monthly payments, it increases the total cost of the mortgage over time. Borrowers will end up paying an additional $50,000 in interest over the full life of the loan. This could lead to higher levels of debt and financial strain in the future, which may not be sustainable for many Canadian households.
Top 5 Best GIC Rates Canada: Lock in High Returns
Best Banks in Canada for Savings, Chequing, and Investing With Pros & Cons
How Trump’s Victory Could Boost Canadian Banks: Key Lenders Set to Benefit
Bank of Canada Executes Significant Rate Cut to Stimulate Job Growth
Bank of Canada Historic 3.75% Rate Cut: Key Impacts on Mortgages, Loans, and Savings 2024
The Long-Term Financial Health Implications
Rogers stressed that while some individuals may benefit from lower monthly mortgage payments in the short term, the long-term consequences of increasing debt could hurt both households and the housing market. “Leaning too much on measures that reduce the short-term cost of financing could have long-term impacts to the financial health of households, the market, and the economy,” she said.
The senior deputy governor also acknowledged that the Bank of Canada is aware of the risks posed by rising mortgage rates and the upcoming wave of mortgage renewals. Higher borrowing costs could lead to increased delinquency rates or force households to cut back on discretionary spending, which could further slow the economy.
However, Rogers also emphasized that the Bank of Canada does not anticipate these factors leading to widespread economic fallout. The central bank’s forecast assumes that households will continue to adjust their spending habits to accommodate higher mortgage payments without significant disruptions.
The Housing Affordability Challenge: A Broader Issue
Despite these cautions, the issue of housing affordability remains one of Canada’s most pressing challenges. High inflation and interest rates have combined with skyrocketing property prices to create a perfect storm, leaving many Canadians—especially younger generations—unable to enter the housing market.
Rogers’ comments were made against the backdrop of heightened concerns about housing affordability, particularly for first-time homebuyers. Many young Canadians have found themselves priced out of the market, and even those who can afford a home are grappling with the reality of increasing mortgage payments.
While there is no quick fix to the housing crisis, Rogers maintains that achieving a balance between supply and demand is the key. Expanding the housing supply and increasing the availability of affordable homes would, in the long run, have a far more meaningful impact on housing prices and affordability than simply altering mortgage rules.
How to Minimize Mortgage Penalties When Breaking Your Mortgage Early
Toronto Home Fails to Sell, Now Up for Auction with Bids Starting Under $1
Canada Housing Benefit 2024: Who is Eligible for $500 & How to Apply?
CMHC Report Highlights: 2025 Mortgage Renewal Risk Impact on Canadian Homeowners
Looking Ahead: The Bank of Canada’s Approach
The Bank of Canada is closely monitoring the mortgage market and its potential impacts on the broader economy. While it remains cautious about intervening too aggressively in the housing market, the central bank continues to focus on maintaining financial stability and mitigating risks to household finances.
Rogers’ speech underscored the importance of avoiding hasty policy moves that could create future financial instability. Instead, the focus should be on long-term strategies that address the root causes of housing affordability, such as the supply-demand imbalance, while ensuring that homeowners are not burdened with unsustainable debt levels.
Carolyn Rogers’ warning serves as a timely reminder that while short-term measures may offer temporary relief, they may not provide the sustainable solution needed to tackle Canada’s housing affordability crisis. The focus, she argues, should be on addressing the underlying issues of supply and demand in the housing market, which will require concerted efforts from all levels of government, the private sector, and other stakeholders.
Ultimately, creating a more affordable housing market in Canada will require a long-term vision and a careful balance between policy interventions and market realities.
Leave a Reply